The liberal media is ramping up their efforts at controlling the narrative after losing a historic election to President Trump.
Judge Napolitano originally broke the Obama wiretapping scandal when he reported that, “President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice. He used GCHQ.”
(via The Angry Patriot)
According to the judge, former President Obama used the British spy agency GCHQ to avoid the paper trail created by our domestic agencies, allowing him to violate federal law with impunity.
The Left immediately reacted, and accused Judge Napolitano of spreading conspiracy theories for reporting his source’s information. Napolitano has since been vindicated by a new CNN report.
The information contained in the new report is not surprising. It is clear to anyone paying attention that Obama violated the Constitution to spy on an American citizen and political opponent for personal gain.
What was less clear is the extent of the spying and what can be proven in a court of law. CNN ended up confirming the allegations of Judge Napolitano, accidentally hurting their own credibility in the process — as if that were even possible these days.
Liberal journalists have a bad habit of reacting first and thinking second. For example, after President Trump made the accusation that Obama “wiretapped” him, the New York Times turned on the president and accused him of lying. It was later revealed that Trump was directly quoting the Times, who claimed Obama wiretapped Trump.
The liberal media acts like the Ministry of Truth from Orwell’s 1984. They frequently rewrite articles from years past to fit the current narrative.
In this case, the New York Times tweaked their wiretapping article to remove the term “wiretapping.” Luckily for us, the internet never forgets, and archives of the original article immediately resurfaced.
Similarly, CNN vindicated Judge Napolitano by saying that U.S. intelligence agencies received communications from British and European sources that included communications between Trump allies and Russian officials. Of course, they quickly stepped back into “fake news” mode and tried to absolve the powers that be of any wrongdoing. But we know the truth: Obama’s administration spied on the Trump campaign in an attempt to sway the election.
CNN may have added in the bit about Russia to implicate Trump, but there’s all the difference in the world between communicating with foreign officials (which every presidential campaign does) and using them to influence the election. It is Obama and his cronies who are guilty of an actual crime here, not Trump.
The liberal media is in bed with the Democrats, and they will do anything in their power to ensure that the American people are subjected to globalist rule.
Do you think Obama will ever be charged for his crimes? Please share the story on Facebook and tell us what you think because we want to hear YOUR voice!